Criminology: Science or Auxiliary Discipline?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7007404

Keywords:

Criminal phenomenon, Criminology, Science, Auxiliary discipline

Abstract

The criminal phenomenon constitutes one of the most delicate study elements of Dogmatics. Penal Code, by virtue of which, attention is paid to an evolution of thought that attributes to the active subject of the crime the category of abnormal, crazy or phenomenon - in its first studies - until considering it a subject of rights that must not only be studied under a bio-psycho-social approach, but also criminologist must also consider the role of the State in the face of such delicate behaviors antisocial. Likewise, based on the constitutional reform in criminal matters of 2008, a guarantee system is established that protects the victim, the offended and the offender. The obligation of the Mexican authorities is to promote, respect and guarantee the fundamental rights of the governed, which is why it is necessary to analyze each specific case under strict adherence to the constitutional principles in criminal matters, namely: nouns, adjectives and executives. , of which the principle of legality is a key piece. From the above, it is argued that Criminal Dogmatics, understood as the scientific study of Criminal Law, is divided into theory of punishment, theory of crime and theory of the offender, and it is precisely the latter that is responsible for the study of the causes that motivated the subject to commit a crime, that is, its object of study is, in effect, the active subject of the crime.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Alan Jair García Flores, Universidad Veracruzana

Doctor en Derecho y Maestro en Derecho Penal por la Universidad de Xalapa. Catedrático por oposición de Derecho Penal General, Derecho Penal Especial y Criminología de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Veracruzana. Catedrático de Licenciatura y Posgrado de la Universidad de Xalapa. Asesor Jurídico de la Sección 56 del Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Educación.

References

Aníyar de Castro, Lola. (1969). La Victimología. Venezuela: Centro de Investigaciones Criminológicas y Universidad del Zuliá.

Aristóteles. (1945). Metafísica. Argentina: Espasa Caple.

Contreras López, Rebeca. (2009). Derecho Penal: Parte General. México: Códice.

Cuello Calón, Eugenio. (1958). La Moderna Fenología. España: Bosch.

Gamboa de Trejo, Ana. (2014). Criminología y Criminalística, conocimiento necesario en los juicios orales. Letras Jurídicas (30). México. Universidad Veracruzana.

García-Pablos de Molina, A. (2001). Criminología: una introducción a sus fundamentos teóricos. 4a ed. Valencia: Tirant Lo Blanch.

Goppinger, Hans. (1975). Criminología. Madrid: Instituto Editorial REUS.

Grapin, Fierre. (1973). L'Anthropologie Criminelle. París: Presses Universitaires de France.

Hentic, Hans Von. (1971). El Delito. Madrid: Espasa Cajpe.

Herrero Herrero, C. (2001). Criminología. 2a ed. Madrid: Dykinson.

Mantovani, F. (1984). Il problema della criminalità. Milán: Padova.

Popper, K. (1989). Conjeturas y refutaciones. El desarrollo del conocimiento científico. Barcelona: Paidós.

Restrepo, Jorge. (2002). Criminología un Enfoque Humanístico. 3a ed. Bogotá: TEMIS.

Rodríguez Manzanera, Luis. (1981). Criminología. 2a ed. México: Porrúa.

Salvador, F. (1999). Criminología, causas y cosas del delito. México: Ediciones Jurídicas.

Published

2016-08-01

How to Cite

García Flores, A. J. (2016). Criminology: Science or Auxiliary Discipline?. Universita Ciencia, 5(13), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7007404