The Discussion Group as a Generator of Social Discourse in Health Marketing.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7125710Keywords:
Survey, Public Health, Health MarketingAbstract
This work aims to reflect on the Discussion Group, as a field of speech production and on the epistemological break that occurs between this technique and the Survey when it is transferred from the academic field to that of social marketing, during the last two decades of the twentieth century. Its insertion in the capitalist production process and consumer culture in contemporary society, turned the Discussion Group, due to the richness of its verbal interaction, as the privileged research technique to generate social discourse. specifically in marketing and later in the field of public health through the interaction of three interlocutors (public health services, health marketing and social agents). The level of reflection is of a comparative nature, it is located as the technique that summarizes and exemplifies a structural methodological perspective in relation to the survey technique considered as a distributive technique. The resulting text is seen as an open space that helps to rethink and rewrite the experiences of those who have been involved with this research technique in the field of health. In particular, this reflection occurs within the framework of a broader research project, oriented towards the positioning of communication strategies in the context of Public Health and Nursing institutions, in Latin America, which incorporates part of own experience both in the academic field and in the marketing of who this writes.Metrics
References
Bonilla, Loyo, E. (2008) Comunicación, empoderamiento e identidad social de la enfermería en el contexto latinoamericano. 2008-2010, Revista electrónica Razón y Palabra.
Gorden, R. (1975) Interviewing. Strategy, techniquesand tactics, homewodIllinois:Dorsey press.
Stewart, David W., Shamdasani (1990) Focus group. Theory and practice. Londres: Sage
Ruiz, Olabuinaga e Izpizua (1989). La Decodificación de la vida cotidiana. Métodos de Investigación Cualitativa. 2 ed. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto
Piaget, J. (1978) Tratado de lógica y conocimiento científico. Editorial Paidos . 1ª edición, Buenos Aires.
Patton, Michael Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage
Roethlisberger, F. J. y Dickson W. J. (1938) Management and the Worker, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rogers, Carl. (1942) Counseling and Psychotherapy. New York. Houghton Mifflin
Krueger, Richard. (1991) El Grupo de Discusión. Guía Práctica para la Investigación Aplicada. Madrid, España, Ediciones Pirámide, S.A.
Ibáñez, Jesús. (1979) Más allá de la Sociología. El Grupo de Discusión: técnica y crítica. Madrid, Siglo XXI.
Segal, H. (1972) Introducción a la obra de Melanie Klein. Buenos Aires, Paidós.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal adheres to the Creative Commons license in the definition of its policy of open access and reuse of published material, in the following terms:
- Accessibility to articles and other publications in whole or in part under the concept of copying, distribution, public communication , interactive access (through the Internet or other means), explicitly maintaining the recognition of the author or authors and the journal itself (authorship acknowledgment).
- Warning that if the articles are remixed, modified or fragments used in other creations, the modified material cannot be distributed, nor is it allowed to reconstruct versions from the original published articles (derived works).
- The use of the contents of the published articles, in whole or in part, for profit (non-commercial recognition) is prohibited.
The author retains copyright, transfers or grants exclusive commercial rights to the publisher, and a non-commercial license is used.