The Discussion Group as a Generator of Social Discourse in Health Marketing.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7125710

Keywords:

Survey, Public Health, Health Marketing

Abstract

This work aims to reflect on the Discussion Group, as a field of speech production and on the epistemological break that occurs between this technique and the Survey when it is transferred from the academic field to that of social marketing, during the last two decades of the twentieth century. Its insertion in the capitalist production process and consumer culture in contemporary society, turned the Discussion Group, due to the richness of its verbal interaction, as the privileged research technique to generate social discourse. specifically in marketing and later in the field of public health through the interaction of three interlocutors (public health services, health marketing and social agents). The level of reflection is of a comparative nature, it is located as the technique that summarizes and exemplifies a structural methodological perspective in relation to the survey technique considered as a distributive technique. The resulting text is seen as an open space that helps to rethink and rewrite the experiences of those who have been involved with this research technique in the field of health. In particular, this reflection occurs within the framework of a broader research project, oriented towards the positioning of communication strategies in the context of Public Health and Nursing institutions, in Latin America, which incorporates part of own experience both in the academic field and in the marketing of who this writes.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Elizabeth Bonilla Loyo, Universidad de Xalapa

Doctora en Administración y Ciencias Sociales por la Universidad Lasalle, maestra en Comunicación por la Universidad Iberoamericana, licenciada en Psicología con especialidad en el área organizacional y social por la Universidad Veracruzana, Lic. en Educación. Investigadora en el Instituto de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias en Ciudad de Xalapa. Docente y tutora de los doctorados en Educación, Ciencia, Tecnología y Cultura de la Universidad de Xalapa. Miembro de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Investigadores en Comunicación [ALAIC], Miembro de Asociación Mexicana de Investigadores en Comunicación [AMIC], miembro de la Asociación Mexicana de Salud Pública [AMESP]. Miembro colaborativo de “The Comunication Initiative Network” área Comunicación y Desarrollo Sustentable y Sostenible.

References

Bonilla, Loyo, E. (2008) Comunicación, empoderamiento e identidad social de la enfermería en el contexto latinoamericano. 2008-2010, Revista electrónica Razón y Palabra.

Gorden, R. (1975) Interviewing. Strategy, techniquesand tactics, homewodIllinois:Dorsey press.

Stewart, David W., Shamdasani (1990) Focus group. Theory and practice. Londres: Sage

Ruiz, Olabuinaga e Izpizua (1989). La Decodificación de la vida cotidiana. Métodos de Investigación Cualitativa. 2 ed. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto

Piaget, J. (1978) Tratado de lógica y conocimiento científico. Editorial Paidos . 1ª edición, Buenos Aires.

Patton, Michael Q. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. London: Sage

Roethlisberger, F. J. y Dickson W. J. (1938) Management and the Worker, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Rogers, Carl. (1942) Counseling and Psychotherapy. New York. Houghton Mifflin

Krueger, Richard. (1991) El Grupo de Discusión. Guía Práctica para la Investigación Aplicada. Madrid, España, Ediciones Pirámide, S.A.

Ibáñez, Jesús. (1979) Más allá de la Sociología. El Grupo de Discusión: técnica y crítica. Madrid, Siglo XXI.

Segal, H. (1972) Introducción a la obra de Melanie Klein. Buenos Aires, Paidós.

Published

2012-08-06

How to Cite

Bonilla Loyo, E. (2012). The Discussion Group as a Generator of Social Discourse in Health Marketing. Universita Ciencia, 1(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7125710