Contradiction of Thesis 293/2011; Restrictive of Human Rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7144259Keywords:
Human Rights, Diffuse Control, Constitutional Control, Conventional Control, Similar Interpretation, Constitutional Supremacy, Jurisprudence, International AgreementsAbstract
The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, solved the contradiction of thesis 293/2011 which defined that the human rights of international source have the same level that in the Constitution but in front of an express restriction in the Constitution to the exercise of the human rights, there will have to respect what indicates the constitutional norm, which represents a setback in Mexico in the protection of the human rights and limits the conventional control, which is slightly applied in the area of the public administration, even if the first article of the Political Constitution of the United States of Mexico, indicates that all the authorities, in the area of his jurisdictions, have the obligation to promote, respecting, protecting and guaranteeing the human rights.
Metrics
References
ÁLVAREZ LEDESMA, Mario I (2010), Introducción al Derecho, Segunda Edición, México, Mc Graw Hill.
Código de Procedimientos Penales vigente en Veracruz a partir del 11 de mayo de 2013, para los distritos de Xalapa y Córdoba.
Código Penal para el Estado de Veracruz.
Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos.
Convenio 169 de la OIT (Organización Internacional del Trabajo).
Declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los Derechos de los Pueblos Indígenas.
FERRER MAC-GREGOR, Eduardo (2010), El control difuso de convencionalidad, en el Estado Constitucional, México, UNAM.
KELSEN, Hans (1982), Teoría pura del Derecho, Argentina, EUDEBA.
Ley de Amparo reglamentaria de los artículos 103 y 107 Constitucional Federal.
Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos.
VÁZQUEZ AZUARA, Carlos Antonio (2013), Sociología Binaria, análisis de las redes sociales desde un enfoque social y jurídico, México, Editorial Foro Fiscal.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal adheres to the Creative Commons license in the definition of its policy of open access and reuse of published material, in the following terms:
- Accessibility to articles and other publications in whole or in part under the concept of copying, distribution, public communication , interactive access (through the Internet or other means), explicitly maintaining the recognition of the author or authors and the journal itself (authorship acknowledgment).
- Warning that if the articles are remixed, modified or fragments used in other creations, the modified material cannot be distributed, nor is it allowed to reconstruct versions from the original published articles (derived works).
- The use of the contents of the published articles, in whole or in part, for profit (non-commercial recognition) is prohibited.
The author retains copyright, transfers or grants exclusive commercial rights to the publisher, and a non-commercial license is used.
