Debate ético y moral en la teoría de las relaciones internacionales

Mauricio Lascurain Fernández

doi:10.5281/zenodo.10358880

Autores/as

Mauricio Lascurain Fernández Universidad Veracruzana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10358880

Palabras clave:

Ética, Comunitarismo, Cosmopolitismo

Resumen

En el campo de la ética de las relaciones internacionales, el debate entre cosmopolitismo y comunitarismo es uno de los más relevantes en la teoría política y ética contemporáneas. El cosmopolitismo sostiene que los seres humanos, en tanto que miembros de la comunidad global, comparten valores y obligaciones morales universales. El comunitarismo, por su parte, enfatiza la importancia de las comunidades locales y nacionales, y sostiene que estas tienen sus propias dinámicas éticas. Este debate ha dado lugar a conceptos como la justicia distributiva global y la responsabilidad moral de las naciones ricas hacia las pobres. El ensayo analiza la cuestión ética de si las naciones ricas tienen la obligación moral de apoyar a las naciones pobres, y si es así, en qué medida.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Baylis, J. et al (2020). The Globalization of World Politics an Introduction to International Relations, 8° ed. Oxford University Press.

Belic, J., y Miklosi, Z. (2023). Cosmopolitanism and unipolarity: the theory of hegemonic transition. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Vol. 26. Núm. 2. Pp.181-203.

Böröcz, J. (2016). Redistributing Global Inequality: A thoght experiment. En Comerse, R. et al (eds.) Ethics in an Era of Globalization. Routledge.

Buchanan, A. (2004). Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford University Press.

Cochran, M. (1999). Normative Theory in International Relations, A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge University Press.

Da Sá Guimarães, F. (2008). Cosmopolitas e as Teorías de Relações Internacionais: Raws como uma Via Média. Contexto internacional. Vol. 30. Núm. 3. Pp. 571-614.

Dower, N. (1998). World Ethics, The New Agenda. Edinburgh University Press.

Dower, N. (2016). Cosmopolitanism and Community. En Comerse, R. et al (eds.) Ethics in an Era of Globalization. Routledge.

Doyle, M. W. (1997). Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism and Socialism. WW Norton and Co.

Etzioni, A. (2019). Communitarianism: A Historical Overview. En Reese-Schäfer, W. (eds) Handbuch Kommunitarismus. Springer VS, Wiesbaden.

Gardenier, M. (2020). The Struggle Over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics. Vol. 26. Núm. 3. P.p. 345-346.

Giri, P. K. (2021). Inclusiveness in Transnationalism and Cosmopolitanism. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences. Vol. 6. Núm. 1. Pp. 433-437.

Halliday, F. (1999). Morality in International Affairs: A Case of Robust Universalism. En McSweeney,B. (ed.). Moral Issues in International Affairs. Macmillan Press.

Held, D. (2003). Cosmopolitanism: globalsation tamed? Review of International Studies. Vol. 29. Pp. 465-480.

Hutchings, K. (1999). International Political Theory, Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. SAGE.

Jones, P. (2000). Global Distributive Justice. En Valls, A. (ed.). Ethics in International Affairs, Theories and Cases. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Koopmans, R y Zün, M. (2019). Cosmopolitanis and Communitarianism-How globalization is reshaping politics in XXI century. En De Wilde, P., Koopmans, R., y Merkel, W. (Eds.). The struggle over borders: Cosmopolitanism and communitarianism. Cambridge University Press.

Kukathas, C. (1990). Rawls and its critics. Polity Press.

Levy, O., Peiperl, M., y Jonsen, K. (2016). Cosmopolitanism in a globalized world: An interdisciplinary perspective. En J. Osland, M. Li, y Mendenhall, M. (Eds), Advances in Global Leadership. Vol. 9. P.279-321.

Papastephanou, M. (2015). Thinking differently about cosmopolitanism: Theory, eccentricity, and the globalized world. Routledge.

Pausch, M. (2021). The future of polarisation in Europe: relative cosmopolitanism and democracy. European Journal of Futures Research. Vol. 9. Núm. 12. Pp. 1-11.

Payne, R. &. (2004). Democratizing Global Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of People. Harvard University Press.

Sert, D. (2021). The Struggle over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism. Contemporary Sociology. Vol. 50. Núm. 3. Pp. 226-228.

Strijbis, O. et al. (2019). Why are Elites more Cosmopolitan tan mases? En De Wilde, P., Koopmans, R., y Merkel, W. (Eds.). The struggle over borders: Cosmopolitanism and communitarianism. Cambridge University Press.

Strijbis, O., Helmer, J., y De, P. (2020). A cosmopolitan–communitarian cleavage around the world? Evidence from ideological polarization and party–voter linkages. Acta Politica. Núm. 55. Pp. 408-431.

Sucht, P. (2013). Ethics, Justice and International Relations: Constructing an International Community. Routledge.

Verlinden, A. (2016).Global Ethics as Dialogism. En Comerse, R. et al (eds.) Ethics in an Era of Globalization. Routledge.

Welch, D. (2000). Morality and The National Interest. En Valls, A. (ed.s). Ethics in International Affairs, Theories and Cases. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Wright, M. (1996). Morality and International Relations, Concepts and Issues. Avebury.

Zürn, M., y De Wilde, P. (2016). Debating globalization: cosmopolitanism and communitarianism as political ideologies. Journal of political ideologies. Vol. 21. Núm. 3. Pp. 280-301.