Published December 11, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Debate ético y moral en la teoría de las relaciones internacionales

Creators

  • 1. Universidad Veracruzana

Description

 En el campo de la ética de las relaciones internacionales, el debate entre cosmopolitismo y comunitarismo es uno de los más relevantes en la teoría política y ética contemporáneas. El cosmopolitismo sostiene que los seres humanos, en tanto que miembros de la comunidad global, comparten valores y obligaciones morales universales. El comunitarismo, por su parte, enfatiza la importancia de las comunidades locales y nacionales, y sostiene que estas tienen sus propias dinámicas éticas. Este debate ha dado lugar a conceptos como la justicia distributiva global y la responsabilidad moral de las naciones ricas hacia las pobres. El ensayo analiza la cuestión ética de si las naciones ricas tienen la obligación moral de apoyar a las naciones pobres, y si es así, en qué medida.

Files

9. Debate ético y moral en la teoría de las relaciones internacionales.pdf

Files (181.5 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Baylis, J. et al (2020). The Globalization of World Politics an Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press.
  • Belic, J., y Miklosi, Z. (2023). Cosmopolitanism and unipolarity: the theory of hegemonic transition. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 26(2) 181- 203.
  • Böröcz, J. (2016). Redistributing Global Inequality: A thoght experiment. Ethics in an Era of Globalization. (Comerse, R. et al., eds.) Routledge.
  • Buchanan, A. (2004). Justice, Legitimacy and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford University Press.
  • Cochran, M. (1999). Normative Theory in International Relations, A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge University Press.
  • Da Sá Guimarães, F. (2008). Cosmopolitas e as Teorías de Relações Internacionais: Raws como uma Via Média. Contexto internacional, 30(3). 571-614.
  • Dower, N. (1998). World Ethics, The New Agenda. Edinburgh University Press.
  • Dower, N. (2016). Cosmopolitanism and Community. Ethics in an Era of Globalization. (Comerse, R. et al., eds.). Routledge.
  • Doyle, M. W. (1997). Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism and Socialism. WW Norton and Co.
  • Etzioni, A. (2019). Communitarianism: A Historical Overview. Handbuch Kommunitarismus. Springer VS, Wiesbaden (Reese-Schäfer, W.; eds).
  • Gardenier, M. (2020). The Struggle Over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 26(3). 345-346.
  • Giri, P. K. (2021). Inclusiveness in Transnationalism and Cosmopolitanism. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 6(1). 433-437.
  • Halliday, F. (1999). Morality in International Affairs: A Case of Robust Universalism. Moral Issues in International Affairs (McSweeney, B.; ed.). Macmillan Press.
  • Held, D. (2003). Cosmopolitanism: globalsation tamed? Review of International Studies, 29. 465-480.
  • Hutchings, K. (1999). International Political Theory, Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. SAGE.
  • Jones, P. (2000). Global Distributive Justice. Ethics in International Affairs, Theories and Cases. (Valls, A.; ed.). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
  • Koopmans, R y Zün, M. (2019). Cosmopolitanis and Communitarianism-How globalization is reshaping politics in XXI century. The struggle over borders: Cosmopolitanism and communitarianism (De Wilde, P., Koopmans, R., y Merkel, W.; Eds.). Cambridge University Press.
  • Kukathas, C. (1990). Rawls and its critics. Polity Press.
  • Levy, O., Peiperl, M., y Jonsen, K. (2016). Cosmopolitanism in a globalized world: An interdisciplinary perspective. Advances in Global Leadership. (J. Osland, M. Li, y Mendenhall, M.; Eds).
  • Papastephanou, M. (2015). Thinking differently about cosmopolitanism: Theory, eccentricity, and the globalized world. Routledge.
  • Pausch, M. (2021). The future of polarisation in Europe: relative cosmopolitanism and democracy. European Journal of Futures Research, 9(12). 1-11.
  • Payne, R. &. (2004). Democratizing Global Politics. State University of New York Press.
  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
  • Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of People. Harvard University Press.
  • Sert, D. (2021). The Struggle over Borders: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism. Contemporary Sociology, 50(3). 226-228.
  • Strijbis, O. et al. (2019). Why are Elites more Cosmopolitan tan mases? En De Wilde, P., Koopmans, R., y Merkel, W. (Eds.). The struggle over borders: Cosmopolitanism and communitarianism. Cambridge University Press.
  • Strijbis, O., Helmer, J., y De, P. (2020). A cosmopolitan–communitarian cleavage around the world? Evidence from ideological polarization and party–voter linkages. Acta Politica. 55. 408-431.
  • Sucht, P. (2013). Ethics, Justice and International Relations: Constructing an International Community. Routledge.
  • Verlinden, A. (2016).Global Ethics as Dialogism. Ethics in an Era of Globalization (Comerse, R. et al.; eds.). Routledge.
  • Welch, D. (2000). Morality and The National Interest. Ethics in International Affairs, Theories and Cases. (Valls, A.; ed.). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
  • Wright, M. (1996). Morality and International Relations, Concepts and Issues. Avebury.
  • Zürn, M., y De Wilde, P. (2016). Debating globalization: cosmopolitanism and communitarianism as political ideologies. Journal of political ideologies, 21(3). 280-301.