Trolley Legends: Moral Judgment and Decision Making

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6624958

Keywords:

Dilemmas Deontologism, Utilitarianism, Moral Judgment, Decision Making

Abstract

I argue in this article that we are not consistent utilitarians at all times, nor irrational dogmatic deontologists, rather, a mixture of utilitarianism and deontologism that depends on a series of factors undiscovered or convincingly explained both epigenetic, evolutionary, as educational, axiological, psychological learned, conscious and unconscious in decision making. I also argue that decision making is not the same as constructing moral judgment. The second does not always lead to the first. I can have a trial, but not necessarily act accordingly.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Fabio Morandín Ahuerma, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

Candidato SNI. Doctor en Filosofía por el Instituto de Filosofía de la Universidad Veracruzana. Profesor investigador de tiempo completo de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. ORCID: 0000-0001-6082-2207.

References

Bauman, Christopher, McGraw, Peter, Bartels, Daniel & Warren, Caleb. (2014).“Revisiting external validity: Concerns about trolley problems and other sacrificial dilemmas in moral psychology”. En: Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(9), 536-554. DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12131. Recuperado de: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/spc3.12131

Gawronski, Bertram & Beer, Jennifer. (2017). “What makes moral dilemma judgments utilitarian or deontological?” En: Social Neuroscience 12(6), 626-632, DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1248787. Recuperado de: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17470919.2016.1248787

Greene, Joshua, Nystrom, Leigh, Engell, Andrew, Darley, John, Cohen, Jonathan. (2004). “The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment”. En: Neuron (4)2, 389-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027. Recuperado de : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15473975

Greene, Joshua, Sommerville, Brian, Nystrom, Leigh, Darley, John, & Cohen, Jonathan. (2001). “An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment”. En: Science, 293(5537), 2105-2108. DOI: 10.1126/science.1062872. Recuperado de: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11557895

Greene, Joshua. (2008). “The secret joke of Kant’s soul”. En Moral psychology (3), 35-79. Recuperado de: https://philpapers.org/rec/GRETSJ.

Kant, Immanuel. (1785/2018). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Ciudad de México: Ariel.

Pakula, Alan. (1982). Sophie’s choice [Film]. Los Angeles: Universal Pictures.

Platts, Mark. (compilador). (2001). Dilemas éticos. México: UNAM

Styron, William. (1979). Sophie’s Choice. New York: Random House.

Styron, William. (2014). La decisión de Sophie. Barcelona: Kindle.

Suter, Renata & Hertwig, Ralph. (2011). “Time and moral judgment”. En: Cognition 119(3), 454-458. Recuperado de: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-07580-013.

Thomson, Judith. (1976). “Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem”. En: The Monist, 59(2), 204-217. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197659224

Published

2019-12-02

How to Cite

Morandín Ahuerma, F. (2019). Trolley Legends: Moral Judgment and Decision Making. Universita Ciencia, 8(23), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6624958

Issue

Section

Artículos