Assessment of the Human Right to a Healthy Environment in Municipalities of Veracruz: application of the structure–functioning–effects model and INAFED indicators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19475256Keywords:
InnovationAbstract
This article assesses the degree of respect for the human right to a healthy environment in the municipalities of Poza Rica de Hidalgo, Xalapa, and Tuxpan, in the state of Veracruz, during the year 2024. A comparative analysis was conducted using the Structure–Functioning–Effects (S–F–E) model developed by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR, 2012) and adapted through the indicators of Axis 5, “Environment,” from the Municipal Performance Advisory Guide (INAFED, 2024).
The research adopts a quantitative and descriptive approach, integrating normative and institutional evaluation with measurable indicators of environmental management. The results reveal substantial variation among the municipalities studied: Xalapa reached a medium–high level of compliance (ICAM = 0.716); Tuxpan achieved a medium level (0.616); and Poza Rica registered a low level (0.466).
These differences demonstrate that regulatory frameworks and environmental programs are not, by themselves, determinants of the effective realization of the human right to a healthy environment. Their impact depends on operational capacity, transparency, and the existence of measurable monitoring mechanisms.
The findings suggest that environmental institutionalization at the municipal level, along with the establishment of control and verification mechanisms, constitutes a key factor for the success of environmental rights systems at the local level, and for consolidating environmental governance based on a human rights approach.
Keywords: Human rights; healthy environment; municipal management; climate change; conventionality control.
References
Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. (2024). Diario Oficial de la Federación (5 de febrero de 1917, última reforma 18 de noviembre de 2024).
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2017). Opinión consultiva OC-23/17: medio ambiente y derechos humanos. Corte IDH.
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2020). Caso Lhaka Honhat vs. Argentina. Corte IDH.
González-Martínez, C. (2020). Gobernanza ambiental y descentralización municipal en México. Universidad Autónoma de México.
Instituto Nacional para el Federalismo y el Desarrollo Municipal. (2024). Guía consultiva de desempeño municipal 2024. Secretaría de Gobernación.
López-Guerra, M. (2021). Derechos humanos y medio ambiente: aproximaciones desde el principio de progresividad. Revista Jurídica de Derechos Humanos.
Merino, M., & Cejudo, G. (2018). Política pública y gestión local en México: desafíos para la gobernanza ambiental. El Colegio de México.
Naciones Unidas. (1966). Pacto internacional de derechos económicos, sociales y culturales (Resolución 2200A [XXI]).
Oficina del Alto Comisionado de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos. (2012). Indicadores de derechos humanos: guía para la medición y aplicación. Naciones Unidas.
Organización de los Estados Americanos. (1988). Protocolo adicional a la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos en materia de derechos económicos, sociales y culturales (Protocolo de San Salvador).
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente. (2021). Informe regional sobre el estado del medio ambiente y la gobernanza local en América Latina y el Caribe. PNUMA.
Reyes, J., & Barragán, D. (2020). Municipios, derechos humanos y medio ambiente: un análisis desde el control de convencionalidad local. Revista Latinoamericana de Derecho Ambiental.
Secretaría de Medio Ambiente del Estado de Veracruz. (2023). Informe anual de gestión ambiental municipal 2023. Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz.
United Nations Human Rights Council. (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on human rights and the environment (A/HRC/37/59).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal adheres to the Creative Commons license in the definition of its policy of open access and reuse of published material, in the following terms:
- Accessibility to articles and other publications in whole or in part under the concept of copying, distribution, public communication , interactive access (through the Internet or other means), explicitly maintaining the recognition of the author or authors and the journal itself (authorship acknowledgment).
- Warning that if the articles are remixed, modified or fragments used in other creations, the modified material cannot be distributed, nor is it allowed to reconstruct versions from the original published articles (derived works).
- The use of the contents of the published articles, in whole or in part, for profit (non-commercial recognition) is prohibited.
The author retains copyright, transfers or grants exclusive commercial rights to the publisher, and a non-commercial license is used.








